Menu
What’s New
About Us
Overview
TBP Leadership
TBP Content Team
TBP Community
Submit to TBP
Health & Disease
History & Culture
Overview
Essays
Anthropology
Contemporary Culture
Gender and Sexuality
History of Medicine
Religion
Visual Arts
Poetry and Creative Writing
Art Interpretation
Blood Vessel Glass Sculpture Series
Did you know?
Podcasts
Book Reviews
Patient Experiences
Contact
Search
Peripheral Blood Smear (PBS) Course Survey
Peripheral Blood Smear (PBS) Course Survey
Demographics
Name
First
Last
Email
Which gender do you identify as:
Male
Female
Non-binary
How would you identify yourself?
African American / Black
American Indian
Asian / Pacific Islander / Hawaiian
Hispanic
White
Other
Please indicate your current level of training
Medical Student
Resident (internal medicine)
Resident (other)
Fellow (hematology / oncology)
Attending (hematology)
Attending (other)
What is your current primary practice setting?
Academic medical center
Private hospital
Outpatient clinic (academic)
Outpatient (private practice / group)
Is your training (or was your training) done at an ACGME accredited institution?
Yes
No
Prior Experiences
Please estimate how many peripheral blood smears (PBS) have you reviewed in the last 12 months.
For the following questions, please select the answer choices that most correctly identify your prior experiences, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree.
I have previously received formal education on how to review PBS.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
I feel comfortable independently reviewing PBS.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
PBS review is an important skill for a modern hematologist.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
I have an efficient and effective method for reviewing PBS.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Modern laboratory techniques have eliminated the need for PBS review.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
I have previously reviewed an adequate breadth of PBS’s including both common and rare conditions.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
I place greater emphasis on reviewing PBS’s for patients with acute conditions that could be life threatening in a matter of hours to days.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
I am competent in proposing causes of chronic anemia based on PBS morphology.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
I am competent at recognizing distinguishing malignant and non malignant causes of leukocytosis by morphologic findings on a PBS.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
I am competent at recognizing common morphologic findings of thrombotic microangiopathy on a PBS.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
I currently use digital microscopy for the majority of my PBS review.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
I understand the limitations and benefits of digital microscopy compared to traditional compound light microscopy.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
What are your goals for this course?
What are your greatest struggles when reviewing peripheral blood smears?
If you are a current / former fellow, do you feel your education in PBS review was adequate? Why or why not?
Reflect on your prior education on PBS review. What methods have been most effective? Why?
Reflect on your prior education on PBS review. What methods have been ineffective? Why?