Sequencing, Combination, and Reassessment
Learning objectives
After completing this quiz, the learner should be able to:
- explain why CAD management is dynamic rather than linear
- distinguish control, modification, and observation as goal-driven strategies
- recognize when sequencing or overlap is appropriate
- identify triggers that warrant reassessment
- understand when de-escalation is appropriate
- apply longitudinal reasoning to clinical decisions
What is the most accurate description of treatment strategy in CAD?
Which clinical situation most strongly favors complement-directed therapy as initial strategy?
Why is clone-directed therapy often delayed until disease is stable?
Which therapy is generally ineffective in CAD because of disease mechanism?
What is the most common conceptual error in CAD treatment selection?
Which situation most clearly warrants reassessment of current strategy?
When is overlap of control and modification strategies most justified?
Which statement best describes reassessment in CAD care?
A patient observed for 2 years develops increasing transfusion needs and worsening cold-induced pain. What does this change most clearly indicate?
Which principle best captures expert longitudinal management?
A patient achieves stable hemoglobin on complement inhibition and asks whether therapy can be stopped. What is the most accurate response?
A patient on complement inhibition develops slowly rising transfusion requirements over months, yet therapy is unchanged. This most likely represents:
A patient begins clone-directed therapy while continuing complement inhibition to maintain stability during induction. This approach is best described as:
Sort each feature into the correct category:
Match each concept to its clinical implication:
Closing Note
Cold agglutinin disease is not managed by selecting the right drug once.
It is managed by repeatedly asking the right question.
Expert care lies not in choosing therapy, but in recognizing when the clinical question has changed.