Type 2 VWD
Learning objectives
After completing this quiz, the learner should be able to:
- interpret type 2 VWD as a group of qualitative VWF defects rather than a single disorder
- distinguish type 2A, 2B, 2M, and 2N using functional laboratory patterns
- apply the activity-to-antigen ratio without overextending it to type 2N
- recognize why multimer analysis, RIPA, collagen-binding assays, and FVIII-binding assays answer different diagnostic questions
- identify common pitfalls in distinguishing type 2A from type 2M and type 2B from platelet-type VWD
- connect subtype classification to treatment implications, including desmopressin cautions
- use subtype-specific reasoning to explain why antigen level alone does not predict bleeding risk
A patient has mucocutaneous bleeding, VWF 58 IU/dL, platelet-dependent VWF activity 22 IU/dL, FVIII 65 IU/dL, and reduced high-molecular-weight multimers. Which interpretation best fits this pattern?
Which statement best captures the central diagnostic lesson of type 2 VWD?
The platelet-dependent VWF activity-to-antigen ratio is most useful for identifying which type 2 patterns?
Which laboratory relationship is the key clue to type 2N VWD?
A patient has low platelet-dependent VWF activity, a reduced activity-to-antigen ratio, and preserved high-molecular-weight multimers. Which diagnosis should be considered?
Which finding most strongly suggests type 2B VWD or platelet-type VWD?
Why must platelet-type VWD be considered when type 2B VWD is suspected?
A patient has FVIII 18 IU/dL, VWF antigen 72 IU/dL, platelet-dependent VWF activity 68 IU/dL, and normal multimers. What is the most important next diagnostic consideration?
Why can type 2N VWD be mistaken for mild hemophilia A?
Which statement about type 2B VWD is most accurate?
A patient is labeled as having type 2A VWD because of a low activity-to-antigen ratio, but multimer analysis shows preserved high-molecular-weight multimers. What is the best interpretation?
Which patient most clearly needs a VWF collagen-binding assay or genetic testing to clarify classification?
Which statement best summarizes treatment logic in type 2 VWD?
Sort each clue into the type 2 VWD subtype it most strongly suggests.
Matching prompt: Match the subtype with the failed VWF job.
Closing Note
Type 2 VWD is qualitative disease. The protein may be present, but a job has failed. The clinician’s task is not to memorize four labels, but to find the failed function.