Complement Biology (CAD-Focused)
Learning objectives
After completing this quiz, the learner should be able to:
- explain why classical pathway activation is central in CAD
- distinguish C3-mediated opsonization from MAC-mediated lysis
- describe the “hit-and-run” logic of CAD (antibody initiates, complement persists)
- interpret common complement labs (especially low C4) mechanistically
- connect complement biology to why steroids fail and why proximal complement inhibition works
Which statement best captures the core pathophysiology of CAD?
Why can relatively small amounts of IgM produce robust complement activation?
Which complement pathway is the dominant initiator in primary CAD?
The key biologic event that drives most hemolysis in CAD is:
Why does the DAT in CAD typically detect C3d rather than C3b?
What best explains the “hit-and-run” nature of CAD?
Low C4 with relatively less depressed C3 in a patient with active CAD most strongly suggests:
Why is intravascular hemolysis usually limited in CAD?
Why do corticosteroids generally fail in primary CAD?
Which therapeutic statement best aligns with complement biology in CAD?
Sort each feature into the dominant physiologic stream
Match each concept to its implication:
Closing Note
In CAD, the antibody is the spark.
Complement is the fire.
If you follow complement, the rest becomes coherent: why hemolysis is usually extravascular, why the DAT looks the way it does, why symptoms can exceed anemia, why steroids fail, and why proximal complement inhibition works so cleanly.