Clone-Directed Therapy in Cold Agglutinin Disease
Learning objectives
After completing this quiz, the learner should be able to:
- distinguish clone-directed therapy from complement inhibition by therapeutic goal, tempo of benefit, and clinical context
- identify appropriate indications and limits of clone-directed therapy
- select among rituximab-based regimens based on patient priorities, fitness, and risk
- recognize common misapplications and timing errors in CAD management
The primary therapeutic goal of clone-directed therapy in primary CAD is to:
Which patient scenario is most appropriate for initiating clone-directed therapy alone?
Which statement best describes the relationship between clone size and hemolysis severity in CAD?
Why are myeloma-directed regimens generally not used in primary CAD?
A 72-year-old patient with moderate CAD, recurrent infections, and a desire to minimize immunosuppression is considering clone-directed therapy. Which factor most favors rituximab monotherapy over rituximab–bendamustine?
Which represents a common misapplication of clone-directed therapy in CAD?
Sort each statement into the correct category
Match each regimen to its typical role in CAD:
Closing Note
Clone-directed therapy in CAD is not defined by who receives it, but by when and for what purpose. Errors of timing and therapeutic intent carry greater risk than conservative patient selection. Understanding the distinction between disease control and disease modification—and sequencing therapies accordingly—is central to safe, effective care.